I just got my hands on the new Kane
Ikin record, 'Sublunar',
out on 12k. Knowing and loving some of his earlier work, in
collaboration with others and as part of Solo Andata, the record held
a surprise in the form of slow, sparse drum parts. Added to Ikin's
worn-out analogue whirls and unfolding gongs and bells, the overall
sound strikes me as heading toward the same musical landscape as some
dance music artists but coming from a different, more ambient
direction.
To start from the dance musician's
perspective: for a while now, I've been noticing a shared aesthetic
among some more experimental artists that I like to call 'decayed
dance music'. This is electronic music that takes house and R&B
musical elements, tampers with their recording fidelity and then
filters the results through a heady dub techno atmosphere which
itself has been rendered less pristine in some way. For an aesthetic
that is, as
one reviewer recently noted, relatively limited in its timbrel
colour, the results can be quite varied emotionally: from the faintly
apocalyptic techno of Andy Stott to the angelic affirmations of more
house-inflected Tri Angle artists such as Holy Other. What these
different musicians share is a reliance on an idea of approach to
composition: the story of their music is one of taking more puritan
strains of dance music and degenerating them, deliberately wearing
them down until the music is heavy with some sort of playback
contamination. Thus Scott speaks of a “detuned
grit feel” he gets from manipulating late '80s/early '90s R&B
samples to complement bpms that, the interviewer emphasises, are now
much slower than his earlier minimal techno. A reviewer of Holy
Other's new album similarly notes the “extreme
timestretching” involved, the deconstruction of “dance and
pop music source material”. This story of degeneration and decay is
part of the identity and aesthetic experience of these works.
Kane Ikin seems, however, to be
arriving at a similar aesthetic from a perspective not of
degeneration from dance but of probing potential undercurrents of
rhythm within ambient drone. In the past, Ikin's music has often
comprised long mournful notes ululating from among thickets of field
recordings and vinyl crackle. On 'Sublunar', bass drums push into
this undergrowth while the crackles emit snaps of snare rhythms. From
the way these elements are incorporated into the mix, you get the
impression that the rhythms had been lying dormant in the drones,
only now being allowed to grow and agitate. Interestingly, reviews of
Ikin's new album have portrayed the music as threatening to spill
over into something even more agitated. Boomkat
describes the production style as “measured and detailed” to the
extent that it offers only “a tantilising glimpse” of where Ikin
could have pushed the music. Fluid
Radio puts this in more positive terms, detailing an “impression
that each of these short pieces is threatened by chaos, as if pushed
right to the edges... teetering on the tipping point of lunacy”.
In both the case of the slowed-down
dance crowd and that of Ikin's droneish experiments, we have this
notion that the music is being mediated in some way. It's striking
how the articles I cited all share this idea of the music being
“dragged through a hedge backwards” and “dragg[ing]”
us the listener “through the mud”, or of “beats flow[ing]
at the pace of tar” (Stott), of “the sluggish oozing open of
every rhythmic tic” (Holy Other), and of the music being held down
by “an unimaginable weight of water” (Ikin). Whether from the
perspective of degradation or of constrained potential, the music is
seen as being mediated or held back by some material aspect such that
it can't fully express itself. That is, the music's 'true essence' is
prevented from being expressed – or more accurately, I think, these
different works are relinquishing the idea of a self-contained
abstract essence of 'what they
really are'. That abstract essence has been ruptured by the forcing
of its material nature to our listening attention: “this has been
tampered with, this is not quite what it should be!”
Personally,
I love this idea of audible mediation of a work as a compositional
approach. It produces this enjoyable tension where what we're getting
pleasure out of is music that doesn't feel quite whole, that riffs
off of an imagined ideal of the genres it's working within, while at
the same time challenging us to think of it not as being insufficient
in some way but as fully-formed in its own right. (You can see how
'dragging through the mud' can take on a double-meaning here: both as
expressing the notion of mediating the sounds and of besmirching
previously-untained genres.) That tension between degradation and new
form isn't, I suspect, going away anytime soon.

No comments:
Post a Comment